Energy never dies

Hi!

Sooooo, how have I been doing? Very well, thanks for asking! lol

An article a friend of mines posted on fb got me thinking about energy again. The article was about how a guy captured a picture of a ghost/spirit in a photograph.

One thing I'd like to point out was that there are loads of images out there with ghost/spirits in them. The thing is this: we have a program called photoshop lol in which anything is possible to add into a picture. But think, in the past we didn't have this program, so yeah, just stating a fact lol

Anyways, it got me thinking about Chemistry. Chemistry is some kind of science right? Well, it would seem that everything comes from something, Chemistry is likely a part of science that is a narrowed down aspect of it. In the Chemistry class I took there was constantly information like this: a piece is piece within a piece within that piece, and into the tiniest aspect of that piece.

It was seriously like the movie Inception. In this way there's some very tiny product that creates a larger product. Energy is said to only be able to change form, but cannot to be destroyed. Okay. So, that being said science is said to be quite factual right? Most people say "show me proof" well, when it comes to chemistry, they have images and I'm not sure if this is prof enough or, for that matter, how they came about knowing that an atom looks the way we see it has being. Anyways, my point is this, if chemistry, a branch of science says that energy cannot be destroyed and that the human form is made up of energy, then why is it that people disregard spirits/ghost as nonsense? O__o Then does that mean a proven fact is nonsense? That only some parts of science is true and others are false?

I'll tell you something, we are quite dense lol no I mean literally. Our bodies are made up of pieces (I forget the word) so closely compacted together that it seems physical. Like a rock,  or water. Water's particles are spaced farther apart so it's not as dense as a tree or rock.

Also, while I'm here, I'd like to talk about Philosophizing! :) Philosophy dates back to the B.C era (is what I'll call it). Nothing wasn't much until people thought about it and elaborated on they're discovery. Let's take Aristotle. He was more of a "show-and-proof"kind of guy, but Plato was more for ideas. I didn't think either of them was wrong because both sides go hand-and-hand. On one side Plato had the vague ideas and Aristotle would take those ideas and say "Hm...how to prove this in physical terms?"

Now the issue arises when a certain element cannot be proven. Foooooorrrrr example, air. Air exist because we're breathing it, and we can see it in the cold, but we can't touch it. But take away the cold and we can't see it, but it still exist.

I asked my teacher (before this quarter ended), "how do we know we're (supposedly the normal people with perfect sight) not colorblind and the color-blinded aren't the one's seeing things correctly?" he just chuckled. I was completely serious even if I laughed! That's not the point lol

Here's what I did. I decided to tell two of my classmates their clothes was a different color (on a whim) and as my teacher approached I told him his shirt was white, even though it was blue. He seriously looked down to investigate lol Anyways, my point is that to a person who really did see his shirt as white would continue to argue that his shirt was indeed white and not blue. In their eyes it's the way it is.

Do you see where I'm going with this? We believe certain things that are said to be proven, yet in a vague way. One person posted an interesting statement:

"Dozen of people are skeptical of ghost and yet they believe in God, something that isn't proven by someone told them it exist." <---I just paraphrased

Why is it we would believe some things but not others? What causes such biased behavior? Is it that people who claim to have seen things but then someone proves that there's an explanation with physical evidence? What's interesting about this is that even the eyes can deceive us at time...or could it be  the mind? The mind and eyes go hand and hand right?

Somethings we cannot see due to certain circumstances (blockage or not wanting to see) or it's level of frequency (density), such as air. With air we need a certain condition  to see it, if not we won't be able to see it. But it exist. do you get it?

Energy is a pretty funny thing, I think. I don't know too much about it, but just because I don't see it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. But the thing is is that we see energy, it's just compacted. We think "it's physical!" rather than "it's something physical due to energy."

Read a few chemistry books, then book a metaphysics book about energy and I'm pretty sure you'll get the same idea in both.

I like to see both sides, but seriously they go hand-in-hand.

Well, that's all for now

Mon